<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ITAC Blog &#187; Hannaford Bros. supermarket chain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itacidentityblog.com/tag/hannaford-bros-supermarket-chain/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itacidentityblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:59:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Federal Court Rules that Breach Victims Not Entitled to Restitution</title>
		<link>http://itacidentityblog.com/federal-court-rules-that-breach-victims-not-entitled-to-restitution</link>
		<comments>http://itacidentityblog.com/federal-court-rules-that-breach-victims-not-entitled-to-restitution#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ITACadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data breach case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal court ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannaford Bros. supermarket chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID Theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identity Theft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itacidentityblog.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have been a victim of a data breach and your bank account was drained by bad guys, you are not entitled to sue for damages if the losses were already reimbursed &#8212; according to a recent ruling by a federal judge.  This case stems from the 2007-2008 breach of the Hannaford Bros. supermarket [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://itacidentityblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/hannaford1.jpg" alt="hannaford1" title="hannaford1" width="124" height="124" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-364" />If you have been a victim of a data breach and your bank account was drained by bad guys, you are not entitled to sue for damages if the losses were already reimbursed &#8212; according to a recent ruling by a federal judge.  This case stems from the 2007-2008 breach of the Hannaford Bros. supermarket chain that involved 4.2 million credit and debit card numbers being exposed to hackers.  According to Wired <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/05/court-rules-breach-victims-not-entitled-to-restitution/">Threat Level</a>, of those accounts numbers that were stolen, about 1,800 are known to have been used for fraudulent purchases.</p>
<p>What do you all think about this law?  On one side, for people whose accounts were fully reimbursed, we understand that their lives had been restored, and in the eyes of the judge of this case, all is good again.  On the flip side, what about the emotional toll and damages that occur during the time when one realizes that their accounts have been raided and when they are reimbursed.  Having ones bank account drained by a crook is certainly a stressful thing &#8211; without a doubt.  Again, we welcome your thoughts on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itacidentityblog.com/federal-court-rules-that-breach-victims-not-entitled-to-restitution/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

