<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ITAC Blog &#187; cyber attacks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itacidentityblog.com/tag/cyber-attacks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itacidentityblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:59:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Many CEOs Don&#8217;t Consider Their Companies Vulnerable to Data Breaches</title>
		<link>http://itacidentityblog.com/many-ceos-dont-consider-their-companies-vulnerable-to-data-breaches</link>
		<comments>http://itacidentityblog.com/many-ceos-dont-consider-their-companies-vulnerable-to-data-breaches#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ITACadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEOs not feeling vulnerable to cyber attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data breaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identity Theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identity Theft Assistance Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ounce Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponemon Institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itacidentityblog.com/?p=642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you all know that most CEOs do not think that their companies are vulnerable to data breaches?  And if attacked, they are confident in their ability to combat the breach &#8212; according to a recent study by Ounce Labs and Ponemon Institute.  The study also found that the executives who report to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://itacidentityblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/CEO.jpg" alt="CEO" title="CEO" width="135" height="130" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-643" />Did you all know that most CEOs <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10288215-83.html">do not think</a> that their companies are vulnerable to data breaches?  And if attacked, they are confident in their ability to combat the breach &#8212; according to a recent study by Ounce Labs and Ponemon Institute.  The study also found that the executives who report to the CEO have a completely different perspective and feel vulnerable and ill-equipped to deal with an attack. </p>
<p>The survey also found that 82 percent of senior executives said their organization has experienced a data breach, with 94 percent saying they&#8217;ve been hit in the last six months. About 53 percent say they&#8217;re attacked on a daily or even hourly basis.  So, what is the take away?  Data breaches are real and they happen.</p>
<p>While confidence is an admirable trait in the CEO, it sounds like many are actually too confident and the side-effect of this behavior can be devastating.   The good news is that many of the executives that report to the CEO are worried and, most likely, have a data breach plan in place.  We hope&#8230;for their sake.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itacidentityblog.com/many-ceos-dont-consider-their-companies-vulnerable-to-data-breaches/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon Detected 360 Million Attempts to Penetrate its Networks in 2008</title>
		<link>http://itacidentityblog.com/pentagon-detected-360-million-attempts-to-penetrate-its-networks-in-2008</link>
		<comments>http://itacidentityblog.com/pentagon-detected-360-million-attempts-to-penetrate-its-networks-in-2008#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ITACadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60-day cyber review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber czar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itacidentityblog.com/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-327" title="pentagon" src="http://itacidentityblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/pentagon.jpg" alt="pentagon" width="150" height="110" />Well, it seems that the recent breach of the Joint Fighter Strike project was not the first cyber attack against the Department of Defense.  According to a recent Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124153427633287573.html">article</a>, the Pentagon confirmed that it detected 360 million attempts to penetrate its networks in 2008, which is up from six million in 2006.  The Department of Defense also disclosed that it had spent $100 million in the past six months repairing damage from these cyber attacks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-327" title="pentagon" src="http://itacidentityblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/pentagon.jpg" alt="pentagon" width="150" height="110" />Well, it seems that the recent breach of the Joint Fighter Strike project was not the first cyber attack against the Department of Defense.  According to a recent Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124153427633287573.html">article</a>, the Pentagon confirmed that it detected 360 million attempts to penetrate its networks in 2008, which is up from six million in 2006.  The Department of Defense also disclosed that it had spent $100 million in the past six months repairing damage from these cyber attacks.</p>
<p>While we are not surprised that the Joint Strike Fighter <a href="http://www.gotgeoint.com/archives/breaking-news-fighter-jet-project-breached-by-cyberspies/">breach</a> was not the only attempt at attacking the Pentagon&#8217;s networks, we are astounded by the sheer volume of attacks.  We are also curious to hear how the 2009 numbers will shake out, which will surely be an increase in the 2008.  Also, $100 million dollars is a significant investment for the Department of Defense, but surely they will need to pore even more resources into fighting this battle.</p>
<p>We are still anxiously <a href="http://itacidentityblog.com/us-cybersecurity-report-delayed-due-to-swine-flu-outbreach">await the results</a> of the Obama administration recently completed a 60-day review of the government&#8217;s efforts to protect key public and private networks.  And, fortunately, the Pentagon will be creating a new <a href="http://itacidentityblog.com/in-wake-of-pentagon-breach-obama-calls-for-new-military-cyber-security-command">&#8220;cyber command&#8221; </a>for defending the Pentagon computer networks and improve U.S. offensive capabilities.  So, our government is moving forward with addressing this issue.</p>
<p>Interesting times we live in right now.  We will keep you posted on the results of the 60-day cyber review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itacidentityblog.com/pentagon-detected-360-million-attempts-to-penetrate-its-networks-in-2008/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

