<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ITAC Blog &#187; American Veterinary Medical Association</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itacidentityblog.com/tag/american-veterinary-medical-association/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itacidentityblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:11:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8220;No, But Thanks:&#8221;  Healthcare Providers Want &#8220;Red Flag&#8221; Exception</title>
		<link>http://itacidentityblog.com/no-but-thanks-healthcare-providers-want-red-flag-exception</link>
		<comments>http://itacidentityblog.com/no-but-thanks-healthcare-providers-want-red-flag-exception#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ITACadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Dental Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Osteopathic Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Veterinary Medical Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InformationWeek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Leibowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Flags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Flags Rule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itacidentityblog.com/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, a letter was sent to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairman Jon Leibowitz by leaders of the American Medical Association, American Osteopathic Association, American Dental Association and American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) to exclude healthcare professionals from a “red flags” rule intended to combat identity theft.
According to this article from CMIO, The FTC&#8217;s interpretation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://itacidentityblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/RedFlags.jpg" alt="RedFlags" title="RedFlags" width="138" height="103" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1022" />Last week, a letter was sent to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairman Jon Leibowitz by leaders of the American Medical Association, American Osteopathic Association, American Dental Association and American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) to exclude healthcare professionals from a “red flags” rule intended to combat identity theft.</p>
<p>According to this <a href="http://www.cmio.net/index.php?option=com_articles&#038;view=article&#038;id=20432&#038;division=cmio">article </a>from CMIO, The FTC&#8217;s interpretation of the regulation imposes an unfunded mandate on healthcare professionals for detecting and responding to identity theft, according to the organizations. In the letter, they asked the FTC to make it clear that the rule will not apply to their members given the result of recent litigation brought by the American Bar Association against the FTC where the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that lawyers should be excluded from the requirements imposed by the &#8220;red flags&#8221; rule.</p>
<p>What do you all think about this?  George Hulme the Healthcare blogger for InformationWeek had <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2010/01/health_care_pro.html;jsessionid=0XD2TTOAACM2DQE1GHPCKHWATMY32JVN">this </a>to say: <strong> Step up and protect your customers from identity theft.</strong></p>
<p>We believe that George has a valid point.  Healthcare providers deal with sensitive customer information that can easily be compromised.  Even though the Red Flags rule may be cumbersome to meet the requirements, what is the alternative?  Having patients accept the responsibility when they become victims of identity theft?  Wouldn&#8217;t it be better to have steps in place to ensure that this data is protected?  We welcome all thoughts and feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itacidentityblog.com/no-but-thanks-healthcare-providers-want-red-flag-exception/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
