Does The U.S. Need Better PR Regarding Cyber Security? Simulated Attack Shows That We Are Unprepared

It certainly seems like there is a common theme coursing through all of the cyber security press coverage these days: our nation is totally unprepared for a cyber attack. Earlier this week, we covered a story about the National Security Cyberspace Institute (NSCI) report that basically stated that our cyber security policies are lip service at this point. And, to add fuel to the fire, Cyber ShockWave simulated and actual cyberattack on America recently, and it showed that we are not effectively protecting our cyber infrastructure.

The simulation began with a virus infecting smartphones and was then transmitted to users’ PCs when they synced their computers with their smartphones. It took down wireless and wired networks through a distributed denial of service attack, sending large video files out until they flooded the networks. And, from there, it actually shut down telecom networks, electrical grids and gase lines…all hypothetically of course.

So, what is the administration to do with all this press coverage that shows how completely vulnerable we are? Perhaps a better PR campaign to showcase any upcoming developments, momentum and new policies — basically show that we are addressing these issues. Then again, the big challenge in doing security-related publicity is that one does not want to let the “bad guys” know what is going on. Yes, it is a fine line to walk. But either way, we look vulnerable and weak, which could only whet the bad guys’ appetites a bit more. What do you all think?